Appellate Litigation Clinic participants and third-year students, Madeleine B. "Maddie" Hoss and Benjamin K. "Ben" Price, recently presented oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The case at hand, Stout v. Preston County Sheriff’s Department, involved their client's claim of excessive force against a deputy who ordered a K-9 to apprehend him during his arrest. Hoss and Price, who also played a significant role in drafting the briefs, were assisted by third-year student Leila Y. Harrison in preparing for the argument.
The courtroom was abuzz as Hoss began her argument, passionately advocating for justice on behalf of her client. She argued that the deputy's decision to deploy a K-9 during the arrest constituted an unnecessary and excessive use of force. Hoss asserted, "Our client suffered severe injuries as a result of the deputy's actions, which were clearly in violation of his constitutional rights."
Price followed up with a compelling argument, highlighting the importance of holding law enforcement accountable for their actions. He emphasized, "We must remember that law enforcement officers are entrusted with the responsibility to protect and serve, not to inflict harm on individuals during their arrest." Price eloquently presented his case, emphasizing the need for justice and urging the court to rule in favor of their client.
The opposing counsel, representing the Preston County Sheriff's Department, argued that the force used by the deputy was justified given the circumstances of the arrest. However, Hoss and Price were quick to counter this argument, citing previous court rulings that emphasized the need for law enforcement to exercise restraint and use only the necessary force to carry out their duties.
Throughout the proceedings, Hoss and Price demonstrated their legal expertise and their unwavering dedication to seeking justice for their client. Their arguments were well-researched, supported by relevant case law, and presented with conviction.
The judges on the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals appeared engaged and attentive during the arguments. They posed probing questions to both sides, seeking clarification and challenging the legal arguments presented. The courtroom atmosphere was intense yet respectful, as the judges carefully considered the arguments put forth by Hoss and Price.
Reflecting on their experience, Hoss expressed gratitude for the opportunity to advocate for her client in such a prestigious setting. She stated, "Arguing before the Fourth Circuit was both exhilarating and humbling. It was an honor to present our client's case before such distinguished judges."
Price echoed Hoss's sentiments, adding, "This experience has solidified my passion for appellate advocacy. I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the pursuit of justice through my work at the Appellate Litigation Clinic."
The outcome of the case is yet to be determined, as the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals carefully deliberates on the arguments presented by both parties. Regardless of the final decision, Hoss, Price, and Harrison can be proud of their diligent efforts and the exceptional legal representation they provided to their client.
In a justice system that relies on the dedication and expertise of young legal professionals, Hoss and Price's successful argument before the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals serves as a testament to the quality of education and training provided at their law school. They have undoubtedly made a significant impact on their client's pursuit of justice and have set a high standard for future advocates to aspire to.