Appellate Litigation Clinic participant and third-year student Jake R. Shatzer recently presented arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in a significant asylum case. The case, Hernandez-Diaz v. Garland, involves the requests for asylum and withholding of removal by two siblings.
Shatzer, along with the assistance of second-year student Vladyslav "Vlad" Rudzinsky and 2023 alumnus Justin W. Tilghman, played a crucial role in drafting the briefs for the case. The team's efforts were further supported by third-year student Max J. Abramson, who helped Shatzer prepare for the oral argument.
During the proceedings, Shatzer eloquently presented his arguments, emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of individuals seeking asylum. He highlighted the compelling circumstances faced by the two siblings, whose lives are at risk if they are forced to return to their home country.
In his remarks, Shatzer stated, "The Hernandez-Diaz siblings have endured unimaginable hardships, and their lives would be in grave danger if they were to be deported. It is our duty to ensure that their plea for asylum is given the utmost consideration and that they are granted the protection they so desperately need."
The courtroom was filled with anticipation as Shatzer confidently and skillfully addressed the panel of judges. His thorough preparation and extensive knowledge of the case were evident throughout his argument.
"The dedication and hard work put forth by Jake and his team are commendable," said Professor Emily K. Ward, who supervised the Appellate Litigation Clinic. "Their commitment to upholding the principles of justice and advocating for those in need is truly inspiring."
The Appellate Litigation Clinic at [University Name] provides students with valuable hands-on experience in appellate advocacy. Under the guidance of experienced faculty, students have the opportunity to work on real cases, like Hernandez-Diaz v. Garland, and make a meaningful impact in the legal field.
Following the conclusion of the arguments, the Court of Appeals will carefully consider the case and issue a ruling in due course. The outcome of this case will not only have implications for the Hernandez-Diaz siblings but will also shape the future of asylum law in the Fourth Circuit.
As Shatzer awaits the court's decision, he remains hopeful that justice will prevail. "We have presented a compelling case, backed by substantial evidence. I am confident that the court will recognize the urgency and gravity of the situation and grant the Hernandez-Diaz siblings the protection they deserve," he expressed.
The dedication and hard work demonstrated by Jake R. Shatzer and his team in Hernandez-Diaz v. Garland serve as a testament to the commitment of young legal professionals in making a positive difference in the lives of those in need. Their efforts in advocating for the rights of asylum seekers are truly commendable, and their impact will undoubtedly be felt far beyond the courtroom.